Showing only posts tagged HastyImpressions. Show all posts.

Hasty Impressions: NCover

2011-11-09 Development .NET / coverage / HastyImpressions / IIS / Isolator / NCover / Testing / TypeMock Part 5 of .NET Coverage Tools

[TOC]

I tried NCover 3.4.18.6937.

The Cost

NCover Complete is $479 plus $179 for a 1-year subscription (which gives free version updates). I thought this was a little steep. NCover Classic is $199/$99. I looked at NCover Complete, because that's the kind of trial version they …

Hasty Impressions: OpenCover

2011-08-15 Development .NET / coverage / OpenCover / HastyImpressions / Isolator / Testing / TypeMock Part 4 of .NET Coverage Tools

OpenCover is developed by Shaun Wilde. He was a developer on (and is the only remaining maintainer of) PartCover. He's used what he learned working on PartCover to develop OpenCover, but OpenCover is a new implementation, not a port.

I tried OpenCover 1.0.514. Since I downloaded a couple …

Hasty Impressions: PartCover

2011-08-05 Development .NET / coverage / HastyImpressions / OpenCover / PartCover / Testing Part 3 of .NET Coverage Tools

Technical stuff

PartCover has a GUI runner as well as a command-line mode. It integrates with Isolator, but doesn't offer any help for those wanting to profile IIS-hosted applications. There are some XSL files provided that allow one to generate HTML reports, but probably the better way is to use …

Hasty Impressions: dotCover 1.1

2011-07-29 Development .NET / coverage / dotCover / HastyImpressions / IIS / Isolator / MightyMoose / Testing / TypeMock Part 2 of .NET Coverage Tools

I tried JetBrains dotCover 1.1, integrated with ReSharper 5.1 running in VS2008.

The Cost

A lifetime license, with 1 year of free upgrades is ~~$199~~ $149 - a special introductory price.

This isn't usurious, but considering that ReSharper C# edition, a tool that changes the way I work every …

Hasty impressions: Continuous testing using AutoTest.NET

2010-11-12 Development .NET / AutoTest.Net / HastyImpressions / Testing

Rinat Abdullin recently posted about Mighty Moose and AutoTest.NET, two projects for continuous testing in the .NET/Mono space. My interest was immediately piqued, as I'm a huge fan of continuous testing. I've been using py.test to run my Python unit tests for years now, almost solely because …